Posts: 134
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2018
I think the thing with Jordan Peterson is he approaches things from a psycology point of view not an emotive one which is something I like because his points (whether i agree or not) are more rational.
Even if you disagree with him, i would suggest you listen to him talk because his public speaking skills are awesome and a great example of how to debate. Obviously you have the likes of Ben Shapiro who is known for 'destroying' people, and as fun as they are to watch as as great as it is to do that in a debate / arguement, I think Jordan is a better example of how to have a 'nice' debate.
I personally think that most of what he says makes sense and I would love to go to his lectures
Adult Female
(09-26-2020, 04:30 AM)sara_s Wrote: I think the thing with Jordan Peterson is he approaches things from a psycology point of view not an emotive one which is something I like because his points (whether i agree or not) are more rational.
Even if you disagree with him, i would suggest you listen to him talk because his public speaking skills are awesome and a great example of how to debate. Obviously you have the likes of Ben Shapiro who is known for 'destroying' people, and as fun as they are to watch as as great as it is to do that in a debate / arguement, I think Jordan is a better example of how to have a 'nice' debate.
I personally think that most of what he says makes sense and I would love to go to his lectures
giirllllll we should go together
(09-26-2020, 04:30 AM)sara_s Wrote: I think the thing with Jordan Peterson is he approaches things from a psycology point of view not an emotive one which is something I like because his points (whether i agree or not) are more rational.
Even if you disagree with him, i would suggest you listen to him talk because his public speaking skills are awesome and a great example of how to debate. Obviously you have the likes of Ben Shapiro who is known for 'destroying' people, and as fun as they are to watch as as great as it is to do that in a debate / arguement, I think Jordan is a better example of how to have a 'nice' debate.
I personally think that most of what he says makes sense and I would love to go to his lectures
soooo im not crazy for liking some of his talkssss ?
Posts: 637
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 637
Threads: 18
Joined: Sep 2013
(09-26-2020, 04:13 PM)Meggy Wrote: (09-26-2020, 02:00 PM)Kittykat Wrote: (09-26-2020, 12:01 PM)Meggy Wrote: (09-26-2020, 01:00 AM)Kittykat Wrote: (09-25-2020, 10:36 PM)Meggy Wrote: oh lol wtf?
Hey now, language...
not my fault that word doesn't get edited out...
Brat, lol
lolz only sometimes!! hey I PMd u something important is that ok? I saw u didnt like PMs ug I suck srry.
You do not suck! Its perfectly fine!
Posts: 134
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2018
(09-26-2020, 12:00 PM)Meggy Wrote: (09-26-2020, 04:30 AM)sara_s Wrote: I think the thing with Jordan Peterson is he approaches things from a psycology point of view not an emotive one which is something I like because his points (whether i agree or not) are more rational.
Even if you disagree with him, i would suggest you listen to him talk because his public speaking skills are awesome and a great example of how to debate. Obviously you have the likes of Ben Shapiro who is known for 'destroying' people, and as fun as they are to watch as as great as it is to do that in a debate / arguement, I think Jordan is a better example of how to have a 'nice' debate.
I personally think that most of what he says makes sense and I would love to go to his lectures
soooo im not crazy for liking some of his talkssss?
Absolutely not, he is a great person to listen to
Jordan Peterson kind of straddles self help/public speaker/intellectual. That kind of puts him in a different category from some of the people I like.
|